Police race relations deserve more meaningful attention than error-filled consultant report provides
by
Patricia Digh
Update 9/10/07:
When contacted this morning by phone, Lynda O'Connell, executive director of the Virginia Center for Policing Innovation, the organization that Lt Franklin represents, had this to say: “We knew nothing about it. We do not endorse it. We disagree with the quality and representation of the report. Again, the report has nothing to do with VCPI. We do not endorse it at all. It was done without our knowledge, without our participation, and without our endorsement.” Not exactly a ringing endorsement of the report.
My question is this: why did the AC-T not uncover these facts before running their front-page story with the headline “Police hit on race relations”?
My
core message is this: I believe that every police department in the country
should be accountable to do better in terms of their relationships with
minority communities--and the APD is no exception to that. However, the AC-T
had no business running such an inflammatory story without at the very least
documenting the faults in the report and uncovering the fact that the
report was not endorsed by the very organization the consultant represented.
My response to the 9/9/07 front page story in the AC-T:
The recent report to the city by “diversity consultant” Anthony
Franklin (as available on the AC-T website) is an embarrassment, and not for
the reasons described by the recent front-page
article in the Asheville Citizen-Times (AC-T). Sure, like every municipal
police department (and most corporations) in this country, the APD could likely
do more to enhance diversity in its ranks and between its officers and the
minority communities it serves. I’m sure there is work to be done, improvements
to be made, people to be held accountable--there always is, because positive relations
between police and minority communities are typically difficult and very
complex across the U.S. Asheville is no exception.
I don’t know the truth of the APD’s record on race relations, but I know I
won’t find it in the consultant’s report featured in the AC-T. To be honest, I
don’t know what is more appalling—the document itself, the fact that our
newspaper covered it as fact on the front page in large type, or the thought
that the City might actually pay attention to it.
In an area as “hot” as race relations, this is a
dangerous place to fuel fires with misinformation, or information so badly
presented as to be misread. To do so—as the AC-T has done—is irresponsible.
I
urge City officials to consider themselves at risk if they make decisions about
the APD (or about Asheville as a whole) based on this ill-conceived document. Rather, I would challenge the City to show that it really is serious about diversity issues by exploring in a
more professional and meaningful way how Asheville
Patricia
Digh's first book, Global Literacies: Lessons on Business Cultures and National Cultures, was a
Fortune magazine "best business book" in 2000. Her second book,
The Global Diversity Desk Reference, was published in 2003. She consults
widely in the U.S. and abroad on diversity and race relations, and lives in Asheville.










Recent Comments